Bug 1755842

Summary: [RFE][v2v] Please add Conversion host properties in CFME UI
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Ilanit Stein <istein>
Component: V2VAssignee: Mike Turley <mturley>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Md Nadeem <mnadeem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs>
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: bthurber, fdupont, pvauter, simaishi
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: FutureFeature, TestOnly, ZStream
Target Release: 5.12.0Flags: mfeifer: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1784106 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-26 16:30:22 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: Feature
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: V2V Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1784106    

Description Ilanit Stein 2019-09-26 10:37:26 UTC
Description of problem:
In CFME v2v conversion host is missing details. Essential information, like transport method, max_concurrent_tasks, is not exposed.
In order to fetch such information, need to connect via CFME api/conversion_hosts, which is not a proper way, as well as not always known.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
CFME-5.11.0.26

Comment 2 Fabien Dupont 2019-10-02 14:50:19 UTC
Ilanit, max_concurrent_task is a global setting, as users have no graphical mean to change it.
Exposing the transport method should easy though.

Comment 4 Mike Turley 2019-10-31 19:35:29 UTC
Ilanit, does this satisfy your requirement? (see the screenshot in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-v2v/pull/1060, where the transport method has been added to the list view)

Comment 5 Ilanit Stein 2019-11-06 13:52:59 UTC
Thanks Mike,

Is it complex to move it inside the conversion host info (when clicking the "i" icon),
right under Status and Message, as follows?:
 
  Status:...
  Message:...
  Transport method: VDDK

Comment 6 Mike Turley 2019-11-06 14:41:49 UTC
Ilanit,

Not at all, in fact I implemented it that way already and then Vince asked me to move it out :) I'll put it back.

Comment 7 Mike Turley 2019-11-06 15:09:00 UTC
Scratch that, I discussed it with Vince and he thinks I should leave it where it is now -- I'll leave that between you two :)

Comment 9 Satoe Imaishi 2020-02-21 22:41:26 UTC
Also need: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-v2v/pull/1092