Bug 1755842 - [RFE][v2v] Please add Conversion host properties in CFME UI
Summary: [RFE][v2v] Please add Conversion host properties in CFME UI
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: V2V
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.12.0
Assignee: Mike Turley
QA Contact: Md Nadeem
Red Hat CloudForms Documentation
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1784106
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-09-26 10:37 UTC by Ilanit Stein
Modified: 2020-10-26 16:30 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1784106 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-26 16:30:22 UTC
Category: Feature
Cloudforms Team: V2V
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
mfeifer: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ilanit Stein 2019-09-26 10:37:26 UTC
Description of problem:
In CFME v2v conversion host is missing details. Essential information, like transport method, max_concurrent_tasks, is not exposed.
In order to fetch such information, need to connect via CFME api/conversion_hosts, which is not a proper way, as well as not always known.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
CFME-5.11.0.26

Comment 2 Fabien Dupont 2019-10-02 14:50:19 UTC
Ilanit, max_concurrent_task is a global setting, as users have no graphical mean to change it.
Exposing the transport method should easy though.

Comment 4 Mike Turley 2019-10-31 19:35:29 UTC
Ilanit, does this satisfy your requirement? (see the screenshot in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-v2v/pull/1060, where the transport method has been added to the list view)

Comment 5 Ilanit Stein 2019-11-06 13:52:59 UTC
Thanks Mike,

Is it complex to move it inside the conversion host info (when clicking the "i" icon),
right under Status and Message, as follows?:
 
  Status:...
  Message:...
  Transport method: VDDK

Comment 6 Mike Turley 2019-11-06 14:41:49 UTC
Ilanit,

Not at all, in fact I implemented it that way already and then Vince asked me to move it out :) I'll put it back.

Comment 7 Mike Turley 2019-11-06 15:09:00 UTC
Scratch that, I discussed it with Vince and he thinks I should leave it where it is now -- I'll leave that between you two :)

Comment 9 Satoe Imaishi 2020-02-21 22:41:26 UTC
Also need: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-v2v/pull/1092


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.