Bug 1756936

Summary:	netcdf-devel depending on unavailable libsz.so.2()
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Daniele Branchini <dbranchini>
Component:	netcdf	Assignee:	Orion Poplawski <orion>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel8	CC:	dakingun, emanuele, jspaleta, orion, pertusus
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-09-30 13:02:33 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Daniele Branchini 2019-09-30 09:08:12 UTC

Description of problem:
`netcdf-devel` seems to be present but it's impossible to install


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

netcdf-4.7.0-2.el8.src.rpm
CentOS Linux release 8.0.1905 (Core) 


How reproducible:
```
# dnf install netcdf-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 1:18:21 ago on Mon Sep 30 09:45:37 2019.
Error: 
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides libsz.so.2()(64bit) needed by netcdf-devel-4.7.0-2.el8.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

```

Additional info:

according to https://pkgs.org/download/libsz.so.2()(64bit)
The libaec package for CentOs8  seems to be present in REMI repos. It was my understanding (at least on CentOs7) that REMI and EPEL shouldn't overlap.

It doesn't look like a bright idea, but: should I enable REMI repo to have `netcdf-devel` installed?

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2019-09-30 13:02:33 UTC

You need to enable the PowerTools repo - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#Quickstart