Bug 1774720

Summary: potential memory leak not handling returned context cancellation functions when reconciling
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Daniel Sover <dsover>
Component: OLMAssignee: Daniel Sover <dsover>
OLM sub component: OLM QA Contact: Jian Zhang <jiazha>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: medium CC: bandrade, jiazha, scolange, tbuskey
Version: 4.3.0Flags: dsover: needinfo-
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.3.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-01-23 11:13:20 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Comment 4 Jian Zhang 2019-11-22 09:46:48 UTC
Hi Daniel

Thanks for your explanation!
We running an OCP 4.3 for about 14 hours and have a regression test round on it. 
No memory leak found, LGTM, verify it.
Cluster version is 4.3.0-0.nightly-2019-11-21-122827
mac:~ jianzhang$ oc exec catalog-operator-6b49d676c7-5fv6j -- olm --version
OLM version: 0.13.0
git commit: ba10413e72cfe23724edc588ff25f36dfdbeb37e

mac:~ jianzhang$ oc adm top pods
NAME                                CPU(cores)   MEMORY(bytes)   
catalog-operator-6b49d676c7-5fv6j   6m           48Mi            
olm-operator-c495ddf7c-jtx57        19m          83Mi            
packageserver-754d4947cb-mwd95      1m           19Mi            
packageserver-754d4947cb-n42gl      1m           20Mi

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2020-01-23 11:13:20 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.