Bug 177756
Summary: | FC5T2 release notes -- remove or soften references to non-free software | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora Documentation | Reporter: | Alexandre Oliva <oliva> |
Component: | release-notes | Assignee: | Patrick Barnes <nman64> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Karsten Wade <kwade> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | devel | CC: | wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-18 10:14:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 114398, 168083 |
Description
Alexandre Oliva
2006-01-13 18:12:54 UTC
Thanks for the note. Reassigning to Multimedia beat writer and setting to block FC5 relnotes. Patrick, do you want to take another look at this issue? Relnotes are still set to freeze at end of next week AFAIK. I've softened the references to proprietary technologies. There are still a couple of direct references that I feel are both necessary and advantageous to our cause. The Java section, also mentioned in this bug, has already been cleaned up to a point that *I* consider suitable. One thing you have to remember here is that people are looking for these proprietary programs, and we must refer to them for people to take our messages about alternatives seriously. In the case of multimedia software, generic references to MP3 and DVD (MPEG) are enough, and there's not much need to point directly at program names. In the case of programs that are license-restricted, however, we must point directly at program names. This is why direct mentioning of Flash, Real Player, and Sun's Java are necessary. I've produced a new beat that we probably should have included before. A new Legal section includes the usual trademark disclaimer. We'll need to get the usual legal signoff for it, but it is certainly something we should have. While our current references to trademarked names *should* be within legal parameters, "better safe than sorry" is always a good approach. It also includes some basic legal information that someone might expect to find in the release notes. With our new, toned-down references in the beats, I'm closing this bug as RAWHIDE. Thank you, everyone, for your attention to this matter. Patrick, fortunately the trademark use issue is already handled in our "legal notice" section -- in that it allows us to use other entities' trademarks while noting they are the property of their respective owners. It doesn't show up as a beat but it is in the finished product. We had done some XML-fu to keep it from appearing at the top of the release notes, for fear of people looking at the top and saying, "oh great, legalese, I think I'll just ignore this." I like the additional information you put in this new page, though, so we should see about including it. Even if it doesn't make it into FC5 final relnotes, it might be useful to add to our overall "legal boilerplate" in Docs CVS (which is the source for the relnotes legalese as well as other documentation) once it gets legal approval. |