Bug 1780100

Summary:	Module stream mailman:2.1 does not have correct module.md file
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Honza Horak <hhorak>
Component:	mailman-2.1-module	Assignee:	Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ondrej Mejzlik <omejzlik>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.2	CC:	omejzlik
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	EasyFix, TestCaseNotNeeded, Triaged
Target Release:	8.0	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-11-04 02:48:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1780081, 1817044, 1825061

Description Honza Horak 2019-12-05 12:12:00 UTC

Based on the content in https://src.osci.redhat.com/modules/ant/raw/1.10-rhel-8.2.0/f/ant.yaml, the module stream ant:1.10 does not define 'name' and 'stream' properly in the module.md file. Reason for doing it was explained in
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.html

Further documentation in RHEL-8 Developer Guide:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IFFvXKvNZpLWAMS9-870bahMMtsWru8QOCIREmkd_58/edit#heading=h.lln13r876joj

Building a module in MBS from production branches (those with rhel-x.y.q suffix) might result in a module ant:1.10-rhel-x.y.q instead of ant:1.10, which is sometimes not that obvious. It is more than recommended to fix the module.md file right away and avoid problems in the future.

Check the tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780081 for more info.

Comment 1 Pavel Zhukov 2020-03-09 12:59:12 UTC

(In reply to Honza Horak from comment #0)
> Based on the content in
> https://src.osci.redhat.com/modules/ant/raw/1.10-rhel-8.2.0/f/ant.yaml, the
> module stream ant:1.10 does not define 'name' and 'stream' properly in the
> module.md file. Reason for doing it was explained in
> http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.
> html
> 
> Further documentation in RHEL-8 Developer Guide:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IFFvXKvNZpLWAMS9-
> 870bahMMtsWru8QOCIREmkd_58/edit#heading=h.lln13r876joj
> 
> Building a module in MBS from production branches (those with rhel-x.y.q
> suffix) might result in a module ant:1.10-rhel-x.y.q instead of ant:1.10,
> which is sometimes not that obvious. It is more than recommended to fix the
> module.md file right away and avoid problems in the future.
> 
> Check the tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780081 for
> more info.

Hi Honzo,

Looks like you (script) messed up mailman with ant and I barely understand what should be done here.

Comment 2 Honza Horak 2020-03-19 11:29:41 UTC

(In reply to Pavel Zhukov from comment #1)
> Looks like you (script) messed up mailman with ant and I barely understand
> what should be done here.

Sorry, the module in the description was indeed wrong, but the problem is still there for the mailman:2.1 in latest rhel branches.

This mail is explaining the change:
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.html

In short, it means you should add:

    name: mailman
    stream: 2.1

into your module.md file.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2020-11-04 02:48:16 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: mailman:2.1 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4667