Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1780100

Summary: Module stream mailman:2.1 does not have correct module.md file
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Honza Horak <hhorak>
Component: mailman-2.1-moduleAssignee: Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Ondrej Mejzlik <omejzlik>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.2CC: omejzlik
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: EasyFix, TestCaseNotNeeded, Triaged
Target Release: 8.0Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-04 02:48:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1780081, 1817044, 1825061    

Description Honza Horak 2019-12-05 12:12:00 UTC 
Based on the content in https://src.osci.redhat.com/modules/ant/raw/1.10-rhel-8.2.0/f/ant.yaml, the module stream ant:1.10 does not define 'name' and 'stream' properly in the module.md file. Reason for doing it was explained in
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.html

Further documentation in RHEL-8 Developer Guide:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IFFvXKvNZpLWAMS9-870bahMMtsWru8QOCIREmkd_58/edit#heading=h.lln13r876joj

Building a module in MBS from production branches (those with rhel-x.y.q suffix) might result in a module ant:1.10-rhel-x.y.q instead of ant:1.10, which is sometimes not that obvious. It is more than recommended to fix the module.md file right away and avoid problems in the future.

Check the tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780081 for more info.
Comment 1 Pavel Zhukov 2020-03-09 12:59:12 UTC 
(In reply to Honza Horak from comment #0)
> Based on the content in
> https://src.osci.redhat.com/modules/ant/raw/1.10-rhel-8.2.0/f/ant.yaml, the
> module stream ant:1.10 does not define 'name' and 'stream' properly in the
> module.md file. Reason for doing it was explained in
> http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.
> html
> 
> Further documentation in RHEL-8 Developer Guide:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IFFvXKvNZpLWAMS9-
> 870bahMMtsWru8QOCIREmkd_58/edit#heading=h.lln13r876joj
> 
> Building a module in MBS from production branches (those with rhel-x.y.q
> suffix) might result in a module ant:1.10-rhel-x.y.q instead of ant:1.10,
> which is sometimes not that obvious. It is more than recommended to fix the
> module.md file right away and avoid problems in the future.
> 
> Check the tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780081 for
> more info.

Hi Honzo,

Looks like you (script) messed up mailman with ant and I barely understand what should be done here.
Comment 2 Honza Horak 2020-03-19 11:29:41 UTC 
(In reply to Pavel Zhukov from comment #1)
> Looks like you (script) messed up mailman with ant and I barely understand
> what should be done here.

Sorry, the module in the description was indeed wrong, but the problem is still there for the mailman:2.1 in latest rhel branches.

This mail is explaining the change:
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.html

In short, it means you should add:

    name: mailman
    stream: 2.1

into your module.md file.
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2020-11-04 02:48:16 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: mailman:2.1 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4667