RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1780100 - Module stream mailman:2.1 does not have correct module.md file
Summary: Module stream mailman:2.1 does not have correct module.md file
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: mailman-2.1-module
Version: 8.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: Pavel Zhukov
QA Contact: Ondrej Mejzlik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1780081 1817044 1825061
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-12-05 12:12 UTC by Honza Horak
Modified: 2020-11-04 02:48 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-04 02:48:16 UTC
Type: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2020:4667 0 None None None 2020-11-04 02:48:26 UTC

Description Honza Horak 2019-12-05 12:12:00 UTC 
Based on the content in https://src.osci.redhat.com/modules/ant/raw/1.10-rhel-8.2.0/f/ant.yaml, the module stream ant:1.10 does not define 'name' and 'stream' properly in the module.md file. Reason for doing it was explained in
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.html

Further documentation in RHEL-8 Developer Guide:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IFFvXKvNZpLWAMS9-870bahMMtsWru8QOCIREmkd_58/edit#heading=h.lln13r876joj

Building a module in MBS from production branches (those with rhel-x.y.q suffix) might result in a module ant:1.10-rhel-x.y.q instead of ant:1.10, which is sometimes not that obvious. It is more than recommended to fix the module.md file right away and avoid problems in the future.

Check the tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780081 for more info.
Comment 1 Pavel Zhukov 2020-03-09 12:59:12 UTC 
(In reply to Honza Horak from comment #0)
> Based on the content in
> https://src.osci.redhat.com/modules/ant/raw/1.10-rhel-8.2.0/f/ant.yaml, the
> module stream ant:1.10 does not define 'name' and 'stream' properly in the
> module.md file. Reason for doing it was explained in
> http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.
> html
> 
> Further documentation in RHEL-8 Developer Guide:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IFFvXKvNZpLWAMS9-
> 870bahMMtsWru8QOCIREmkd_58/edit#heading=h.lln13r876joj
> 
> Building a module in MBS from production branches (those with rhel-x.y.q
> suffix) might result in a module ant:1.10-rhel-x.y.q instead of ant:1.10,
> which is sometimes not that obvious. It is more than recommended to fix the
> module.md file right away and avoid problems in the future.
> 
> Check the tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780081 for
> more info.

Hi Honzo,

Looks like you (script) messed up mailman with ant and I barely understand what should be done here.
Comment 2 Honza Horak 2020-03-19 11:29:41 UTC 
(In reply to Pavel Zhukov from comment #1)
> Looks like you (script) messed up mailman with ant and I barely understand
> what should be done here.

Sorry, the module in the description was indeed wrong, but the problem is still there for the mailman:2.1 in latest rhel branches.

This mail is explaining the change:
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhel-devel/2019-March/msg00612.html

In short, it means you should add:

    name: mailman
    stream: 2.1

into your module.md file.
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2020-11-04 02:48:16 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: mailman:2.1 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4667
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.