Bug 178153
Summary: | epiphany incorrectly compiled against libXt-devel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.salim> |
Component: | mozilla | Assignee: | Christopher Aillon <caillon> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | CC: | sundaram |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-20 11:37:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 150222 |
Description
Michel Alexandre Salim
2006-01-18 02:49:53 UTC
Bug still present in epiphany-1.9.5.1-1 Think this is a bug in the libXt package. mharris what do you think? Bug in Epiphany. It should not be dlopen'ing libXt.so as that is a devel symlink, as in every other library package in the OS. It should either be dlopen()ing the versioned .so, or dynamically linking properly to libXt, like other apps do. Definitely not an Xt bug. HTH Mike, I am pretty sure epiphany is not dlopening libXt.so, as that string does not occur in the sources at all. Any change this could be related to another problem (bug 179044) where we see unversioned X libs being openend ? I actually can't reproduce this at all. Epiphany starts fine for me, and so does mozilla. What plugins do you have installed if any? I can't reproduce this anymore either (1.9.7). As for plugins, I had the 32-bit Flash and Java plugins installed (only the Flash plugin is in the global plugins directory, though, and I did not get a "wrong ELF class" error so Epiphany was not trying to load it) Should I close the bug? Closing this report as per the last comments. Kindly reopen if you can reproduce this consistently. |