Bug 179182

Summary: Null Pointer when building feature in update-site
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jeff Pound <jpound>
Component: eclipseAssignee: Andrew Overholt <overholt>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-13 16:56:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
log file none

Description Jeff Pound 2006-01-27 22:10:32 UTC
Created attachment 123806 [details]
log file

Comment 1 Jeff Pound 2006-01-27 22:10:32 UTC
Description of problem:
A NullPointerException is thrown when eclipse tries to build a feature for an
update site.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
eclipse-platform-3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. check out org.eclipse.team.bugzilla.feature from sources.redhat.com
2. Create a "New update-site" project in eclipse.
3. Add the feature to the update site ("Add features...")
4. Click "Build All"
  
Actual results:
Many MalformedURL exceptions show up in the log and the feature isn't built.

Expected results:
The feature should be built without errors.

Additional info:
Works on upstream eclipse 3.1
see attached log file.

Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2006-02-08 16:19:21 UTC
This still happens with rawhide :( .  I don't get any errors from Eclipse,
though.  Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and
o.e.t.bugzilla).  Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour?

Comment 3 Jeff Pound 2006-02-10 23:09:24 UTC
>Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and
>o.e.t.bugzilla).  Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour?

yes, the feature jar should package the plug-in jars IIRC.

Comment 4 Andrew Overholt 2006-02-13 16:40:24 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> >Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and
> >o.e.t.bugzilla).  Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour?
> 
> yes, the feature jar should package the plug-in jars IIRC.

So there's still a bug?

Comment 5 Jeff Pound 2006-02-13 16:56:51 UTC
Everything seems ok with eclipse-platform-3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12 (no log errors
either)