Bug 179182
Summary: | Null Pointer when building feature in update-site | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeff Pound <jpound> | ||||
Component: | eclipse | Assignee: | Andrew Overholt <overholt> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | 3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-13 16:56:51 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description of problem: A NullPointerException is thrown when eclipse tries to build a feature for an update site. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): eclipse-platform-3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. check out org.eclipse.team.bugzilla.feature from sources.redhat.com 2. Create a "New update-site" project in eclipse. 3. Add the feature to the update site ("Add features...") 4. Click "Build All" Actual results: Many MalformedURL exceptions show up in the log and the feature isn't built. Expected results: The feature should be built without errors. Additional info: Works on upstream eclipse 3.1 see attached log file. This still happens with rawhide :( . I don't get any errors from Eclipse, though. Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and o.e.t.bugzilla). Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour? >Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and
>o.e.t.bugzilla). Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour?
yes, the feature jar should package the plug-in jars IIRC.
(In reply to comment #3) > >Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and > >o.e.t.bugzilla). Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour? > > yes, the feature jar should package the plug-in jars IIRC. So there's still a bug? Everything seems ok with eclipse-platform-3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12 (no log errors either) |
Created attachment 123806 [details] log file