Bug 179182 - Null Pointer when building feature in update-site
Summary: Null Pointer when building feature in update-site
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: eclipse
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andrew Overholt
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-01-27 22:10 UTC by Jeff Pound
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: 3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-13 16:56:51 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
log file (35.97 KB, text/plain)
2006-01-27 22:10 UTC, Jeff Pound
no flags Details

Description Jeff Pound 2006-01-27 22:10:32 UTC
Created attachment 123806 [details]
log file

Comment 1 Jeff Pound 2006-01-27 22:10:32 UTC
Description of problem:
A NullPointerException is thrown when eclipse tries to build a feature for an
update site.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
eclipse-platform-3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. check out org.eclipse.team.bugzilla.feature from sources.redhat.com
2. Create a "New update-site" project in eclipse.
3. Add the feature to the update site ("Add features...")
4. Click "Build All"
  
Actual results:
Many MalformedURL exceptions show up in the log and the feature isn't built.

Expected results:
The feature should be built without errors.

Additional info:
Works on upstream eclipse 3.1
see attached log file.

Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2006-02-08 16:19:21 UTC
This still happens with rawhide :( .  I don't get any errors from Eclipse,
though.  Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and
o.e.t.bugzilla).  Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour?

Comment 3 Jeff Pound 2006-02-10 23:09:24 UTC
>Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and
>o.e.t.bugzilla).  Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour?

yes, the feature jar should package the plug-in jars IIRC.

Comment 4 Andrew Overholt 2006-02-13 16:40:24 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> >Also, there are 3 jars built (o.e.t.bugzilla.feature, o.e.t.bugs, and
> >o.e.t.bugzilla).  Ignoring the log errors, is this correct behaviour?
> 
> yes, the feature jar should package the plug-in jars IIRC.

So there's still a bug?

Comment 5 Jeff Pound 2006-02-13 16:56:51 UTC
Everything seems ok with eclipse-platform-3.1.1-1jpp_1fc.FC4.12 (no log errors
either)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.