Bug 179325
Summary: | localhost are allways prefered regardless of weight | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+rhbz> |
Component: | autofs | Assignee: | Jeff Moyer <jmoyer> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | cfeist |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-01-30 17:03:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Klaus Ethgen
2006-01-30 12:00:54 UTC
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-0211/6m6nc66nc?a=view "Server proximity takes priority in the selection process. [...] The weighting has effect only when selecting between servers with the same network proximity." (In reply to comment #1) > http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-0211/6m6nc66nc?a=view > > "Server proximity takes priority in the selection process. [...] The weighting > has effect only when selecting between servers with the same network proximity." That's not a solution for the problem. The problem is that afs is NOT nearer than the servers. (And there are several other reasons to do it not the sun way: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=139417) Also it is not clear why redhat is destroying the function of the upstream only to fit exactly the same braindammed way, sun did. (Sorry about the hard words) The weighting is needed to override such wrong assignment. To make them useless breaks the use of the package. The point is that on linux it is expected that the weighting overrides all other assignments. All known linux distributions including upstream do it the right way. To destroy this feature in redhat create a high incompatibility to other linux distributions. Sorry, but if redhat do add such incompatibility there should be a way to switch it off. The replicated server functionality that was committed in the autofs 4.1.x stream was broken from the start, so citing the way it works upstream is not a valid argument. I will also note that the upstream implementation may be "fixed" in this regard moving forward. There are many existing installations which include Solaris, AIX, HPUX, Linux, and other operating systems, all using the same automounter maps. If one implementation functions differently from the others, it constitutes a managability problem. I fully understand the merits of of the argument posed in bz #139417, but I am averse to implementing something that makes Linux incompatible with other automounter implementations. I am not clear on why you are mixing NFS and AFS, but I will assume that you have good reason to do so. If you are willing to post your maps and more information about your configuration, I'm happy to work with you to find an alternative solution to your problem. Thanks. |