Bug 1799410

Summary: glibd: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: glibdAssignee: Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 32CC: decathorpe, ngompa13
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glibd-2.1.0-5.fc32 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-21 02:14:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1813529    
Bug Blocks: 1750908, 1799159    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 16:59:54 UTC
glibd failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f32

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41317425


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix glibd at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
glibd will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 33,
glibd will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 16:59:56 UTC
Created attachment 1659047 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 16:59:58 UTC
Created attachment 1659048 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 17:00:00 UTC
Created attachment 1659049 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:08:18 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 5 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-16 04:33:42 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2020-02-23 15:39:16 UTC
Working on it, but also filed upstream issue: https://github.com/gtkd-developers/GlibD/issues/7

Comment 7 Fabio Valentini 2020-03-03 22:51:16 UTC
I can't imagine how this went wrong, but the package you built today/yesterday isn't installable in rawhide:

$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 install glibd-devel

Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides libglibd-2.0.so()(64bit) needed by glibd-devel-2.1.0-4.fc33.x86_64

Not sure how an intra-package dependency can be not satisfied :D

Comment 8 Neal Gompa 2020-03-04 04:24:30 UTC
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #7)
> I can't imagine how this went wrong, but the package you built
> today/yesterday isn't installable in rawhide:
> 
> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 install glibd-devel
> 
> Error: 
>  Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
>   - nothing provides libglibd-2.0.so()(64bit) needed by
> glibd-devel-2.1.0-4.fc33.x86_64
> 
> Not sure how an intra-package dependency can be not satisfied :D

WTF?!

Comment 9 Neal Gompa 2020-03-14 09:16:44 UTC
So this turns out to be caused by a new Meson bug... 🤦‍♂️

Anyway, I've filed bug 1813529 over it.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2020-03-19 23:56:50 UTC
FEDORA-2020-d76b2690b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d76b2690b5

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2020-03-20 01:59:30 UTC
appstream-0.12.10-1.fc32, appstream-generator-0.8.1-1.fc32, glibd-2.1.0-5.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d76b2690b5

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2020-03-21 02:14:25 UTC
appstream-0.12.10-1.fc32, appstream-generator-0.8.1-1.fc32, glibd-2.1.0-5.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.