Bug 1801361
Summary: | dpdk-pmdinfo.py can't work on RHEL8 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Jean-Tsung Hsiao <jhsiao> |
Component: | dpdk | Assignee: | Timothy Redaelli <tredaelli> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jean-Tsung Hsiao <jhsiao> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8.2 | CC: | atragler, ctrautma, jhsiao, ktraynor, ovs-qe, tredaelli |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | dpdk-19.11.1-1.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-11-04 04:02:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jean-Tsung Hsiao
2020-02-10 17:50:38 UTC
Not working --- See log below. Please advise! Thanks! Jean [root@netqe10 yum.repos.d]# /usr/share/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-pmdinfo.pyTraceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-pmdinfo.py", line 18, in <module> from elftools.common.exceptions import ELFError ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'elftools' [root@netqe10 yum.repos.d]# rpm -qa | grep dpdk dpdk-tools-19.11-4.el8.x86_64 dpdk-devel-debuginfo-19.11-4.el8.x86_64 dpdk-19.11-4.el8.x86_64 dpdk-devel-19.11-4.el8.x86_64 dpdk-debuginfo-19.11-4.el8.x86_64 kernel-tests-playground-kernel-networking-ovs-dpdk-tunneling-1.0-85.noarch dpdk-debugsource-19.11-4.el8.x86_64 [root@netqe10 yum.repos.d]# uname -r 4.18.0-193.el8.x86_64 [root@netqe10 yum.repos.d]# You are testing the wrong release (dpdk-19.11-4), but the errata includes dpdk-19.11.2-1.el8. Can you try to test the correct version that should NOT ship dpdk-pmdinfo.py? Thank you (In reply to Timothy Redaelli from comment #4) > You are testing the wrong release (dpdk-19.11-4), > but the errata includes dpdk-19.11.2-1.el8. Sorry about that. > > Can you try to test the correct version that should NOT ship dpdk-pmdinfo.py? Yes, I will. Thanks! Jean > > Thank you The bug has been verified. [root@netqe29 ~]# !find find / -name dpdk-pmdinfo.py [root@netqe29 ~]# rpm -qa | grep dpdk dpdk-devel-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64 dpdk-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64 dpdk-debuginfo-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64 dpdk-tools-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64 dpdk-devel-debuginfo-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64 dpdk-debugsource-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64 [root@netqe29 ~]# uname -r 4.18.0-227.el8.x86_64 [root@netqe29 ~]# Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: dpdk security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4806 |