RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1801361 - dpdk-pmdinfo.py can't work on RHEL8
Summary: dpdk-pmdinfo.py can't work on RHEL8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: dpdk
Version: 8.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Timothy Redaelli
QA Contact: Jean-Tsung Hsiao
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-10 17:50 UTC by Jean-Tsung Hsiao
Modified: 2020-11-04 04:02 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: dpdk-19.11.1-1.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-04 04:02:06 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jean-Tsung Hsiao 2020-02-10 17:50:38 UTC 
Description of problem: dpdk-pmdinfo.py can't work on RHEL8

[root@netqe10 qed]# !$
/usr/share/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-pmdinfo.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-pmdinfo.py", line 18, in <module>
    from elftools.common.exceptions import ELFError
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'elftools'


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@netqe10 qed]# rpm -qa | grep dpdk
dpdk-devel-19.11-1.el8.x86_64
dpdk-19.11-1.el8.x86_64
kernel-kernel-networking-ovs-dpdk-tunneling-1.0-85.noarch
dpdk-tools-19.11-1.el8.x86_64
[root@netqe10 qed]# uname -r
4.18.0-147.el8.x86_64
[root@netqe10 qed]#

How reproducible: Reproducible


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 3 Jean-Tsung Hsiao 2020-07-15 18:48:12 UTC 
Not working --- See log below.
Please advise!
Thanks!
Jean

[root@netqe10 yum.repos.d]# /usr/share/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-pmdinfo.pyTraceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-pmdinfo.py", line 18, in <module>
    from elftools.common.exceptions import ELFError
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'elftools'
[root@netqe10 yum.repos.d]# rpm -qa | grep dpdk
dpdk-tools-19.11-4.el8.x86_64
dpdk-devel-debuginfo-19.11-4.el8.x86_64
dpdk-19.11-4.el8.x86_64
dpdk-devel-19.11-4.el8.x86_64
dpdk-debuginfo-19.11-4.el8.x86_64
kernel-tests-playground-kernel-networking-ovs-dpdk-tunneling-1.0-85.noarch
dpdk-debugsource-19.11-4.el8.x86_64
[root@netqe10 yum.repos.d]# uname -r
4.18.0-193.el8.x86_64
[root@netqe10 yum.repos.d]#
Comment 4 Timothy Redaelli 2020-07-27 10:37:59 UTC 
You are testing the wrong release (dpdk-19.11-4),
but the errata includes dpdk-19.11.2-1.el8.

Can you try to test the correct version that should NOT ship dpdk-pmdinfo.py?

Thank you
Comment 5 Jean-Tsung Hsiao 2020-07-27 15:01:56 UTC 
(In reply to Timothy Redaelli from comment #4)
> You are testing the wrong release (dpdk-19.11-4),
> but the errata includes dpdk-19.11.2-1.el8.
Sorry about that.
> 
> Can you try to test the correct version that should NOT ship dpdk-pmdinfo.py?
Yes, I will.
Thanks!
Jean
> 
> Thank you
Comment 6 Jean-Tsung Hsiao 2020-07-27 17:50:24 UTC 
The bug has been verified.

[root@netqe29 ~]# !find
find / -name dpdk-pmdinfo.py
[root@netqe29 ~]# rpm -qa | grep dpdk
dpdk-devel-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64
dpdk-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64
dpdk-debuginfo-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64
dpdk-tools-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64
dpdk-devel-debuginfo-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64
dpdk-debugsource-19.11.2-1.el8.x86_64
[root@netqe29 ~]# uname -r
4.18.0-227.el8.x86_64
[root@netqe29 ~]#
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2020-11-04 04:02:06 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: dpdk security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4806
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.