Bug 1808439

Summary:	Packages are missing from CCV when CVs have same repository with different include filters
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Manu Sunil <msunil>
Component:	Content Views	Assignee:	James Jeffers <jjeffers>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Lai <ltran>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.6.0	CC:	jjeffers, wpinheir
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Reopened, Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-06-09 13:12:00 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Manu Sunil 2020-02-28 14:32:42 UTC

Description of problem:

 - Packages are missing from CCV when component CVs contain same repositories with include filters for some packages.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 - Satellite 6.6

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

 - Create two CVs
 - Add the same repository to both the CVs
 - Create a filter for including one package in the CV1 and publish the CV
 - Similarly, create a filter for a different package in CV2 and publish it as well


Actual results:

 - The results depend on the way in which the CCV published after adding the content_views
 - If CV1 is added to the CCV and published before CV2 is added, only included packages from CV1 is available in CCV
 - Similarly, if CV2 is added and CCV is published before CV1 is added, only included packages from CV2 is available in the CCV
 - If both are added together and CCV is published, none of the packages are available in the CCV

Expected results:

- All the included packages from both the CV should be available on the CCV

Comment 4 James Jeffers 2020-05-07 11:20:44 UTC

Tested the scenarios in 6.7, and all repositories appeared in the composite view, regardless of the order in which the content views were added.

I'll back track between the 2 releases and triangulate where the issue was fixed.

Comment 5 James Jeffers 2020-05-08 20:06:27 UTC

I attempted to reproduce this scenario on a sat 6.6 install, and was unable to. Is there more context to this issue?

Comment 6 James Jeffers 2020-05-08 20:09:10 UTC

Information like which repository, filters used, etc would be helpful. Thanks!

Comment 8 James Jeffers 2020-05-22 14:54:52 UTC

Is it possible to get access to a reproducer for this issue. I'm not able to reproduce this condition with my local attempts.

Comment 10 James Jeffers 2020-05-29 16:31:46 UTC

Looked at the repodata and the published metadata (unzipped the filelist.xml.gz) for the CCV show no packages:

<filelists xmlns="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/filelists" packages="0"></filelists>

Still investigating the cause.

Comment 11 James Jeffers 2020-06-01 16:06:32 UTC

After checking the published metadata and comparing to a known katello issue re yum distributors, a fix has been identified. 

Upgrading to Satellite 6.6.3 (with tfm-rubygem-katello-3.12.0.41-1.el7sat.noarch, etc is available) should resolve this issue. After the upgrade the CVs should be republished for the packages to appear as available to the content host.

See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814426