Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1808439 - Packages are missing from CCV when CVs have same repository with different include filters
Summary: Packages are missing from CCV when CVs have same repository with different in...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Views
Version: 6.6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: James Jeffers
QA Contact: Lai
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-28 14:32 UTC by Manu Sunil
Modified: 2023-10-06 19:18 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-06-09 13:12:00 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Manu Sunil 2020-02-28 14:32:42 UTC 
Description of problem:

 - Packages are missing from CCV when component CVs contain same repositories with include filters for some packages.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 - Satellite 6.6

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

 - Create two CVs
 - Add the same repository to both the CVs
 - Create a filter for including one package in the CV1 and publish the CV
 - Similarly, create a filter for a different package in CV2 and publish it as well


Actual results:

 - The results depend on the way in which the CCV published after adding the content_views
 - If CV1 is added to the CCV and published before CV2 is added, only included packages from CV1 is available in CCV
 - Similarly, if CV2 is added and CCV is published before CV1 is added, only included packages from CV2 is available in the CCV
 - If both are added together and CCV is published, none of the packages are available in the CCV

Expected results:

- All the included packages from both the CV should be available on the CCV
Comment 4 James Jeffers 2020-05-07 11:20:44 UTC 
Tested the scenarios in 6.7, and all repositories appeared in the composite view, regardless of the order in which the content views were added.

I'll back track between the 2 releases and triangulate where the issue was fixed.
Comment 5 James Jeffers 2020-05-08 20:06:27 UTC 
I attempted to reproduce this scenario on a sat 6.6 install, and was unable to. Is there more context to this issue?
Comment 6 James Jeffers 2020-05-08 20:09:10 UTC 
Information like which repository, filters used, etc would be helpful. Thanks!
Comment 8 James Jeffers 2020-05-22 14:54:52 UTC 
Is it possible to get access to a reproducer for this issue. I'm not able to reproduce this condition with my local attempts.
Comment 10 James Jeffers 2020-05-29 16:31:46 UTC 
Looked at the repodata and the published metadata (unzipped the filelist.xml.gz) for the CCV show no packages:

<filelists xmlns="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/filelists" packages="0"></filelists>

Still investigating the cause.
Comment 11 James Jeffers 2020-06-01 16:06:32 UTC 
After checking the published metadata and comparing to a known katello issue re yum distributors, a fix has been identified. 

Upgrading to Satellite 6.6.3 (with tfm-rubygem-katello-3.12.0.41-1.el7sat.noarch, etc is available) should resolve this issue. After the upgrade the CVs should be republished for the packages to appear as available to the content host.

See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814426
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.