Bug 1810031
Summary: | [BAREMETAL] ocs-operator goes in CrashLoopBackOff State if storageclass is not selected while deploying ocs-storagecluster from UI | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage | Reporter: | Pratik Surve <prsurve> |
Component: | management-console | Assignee: | Bipul Adhikari <badhikar> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Elad <ebenahar> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 4.3 | CC: | afrahman, jefbrown, madam, nberry, nthomas, ocs-bugs, ratamir, sabose |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-03-20 07:58:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Comment 3
Nishanth Thomas
2020-03-05 12:41:48 UTC
Thanks, prsurve This feature is being worked on and targeted for 4.5 Moving out. Hi Nishanth, I understand we can't do changes in the UI for 4.3 at this point but this bug is too severe and have to be fixed in 4.3. Maybe we can set a default SC in case nothing was selected from the UI? (moving back to 4.3 until we'll have conclusion) (In reply to Raz Tamir from comment #7) > Hi Nishanth, > > I understand we can't do changes in the UI for 4.3 at this point but this > bug is too severe and have to be fixed in 4.3. > > Maybe we can set a default SC in case nothing was selected from the UI? > > (moving back to 4.3 until we'll have conclusion) On Baremetal environments - OCS cluster can only be created via the documented steps - i.e manually creating a cluster yaml from CLI. Creating from UI is not supported. What's the expectation here? Hi Sahina, The documented steps are for the device discovery to happen (LSO) and the deployment should be from the UI like any other platform - that's the expectation. allowing customers (intentionally) to deploy from CLI was considered in 4.2 as a NO GO from Dev side so I don't see any reason to change this decision now (In reply to Sahina Bose from comment #10) > (In reply to Raz Tamir from comment #9) > > Hi Sahina, > > > > The documented steps are for the device discovery to happen (LSO) and the > > deployment should be from the UI like any other platform - that's the > > expectation. > > allowing customers (intentionally) to deploy from CLI was considered in 4.2 > > as a NO GO from Dev side so I don't see any reason to change this decision > > now > > For baremetal deployment - deploying from CLI is the only option that Dev > has acked and worked on. > Not sure where the disconnect is coming from, but the UI is a 4.5 item at > this point. To clarify, the documented steps are not just for the device discovery - we do have the manual steps to change MONs to use hostPath, provide the size of OSD based on attached device sizes as documented in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-824 Thanks for clarification Sahina, Moving back to 4.5 Cancelling the needinfo on me Possible duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811003 The UI is same for any platform. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1811003 *** |