Bug 1817770
| Summary: | xonsh fails to build with Python 3.9: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'int' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
| Component: | xonsh | Assignee: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 33 | CC: | carmen, cstratak, igor.raits, jdulaney, kparal, lbalhar, lewk, mhroncok, mplch, python-sig |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | AcceptedFreezeException | ||
| Fixed In Version: | xonsh-0.9.21-1.fc34 xonsh-0.9.21-1.fc33 xonsh-0.9.21-1.eln108 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-09-14 23:44:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1822355 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1766776, 1785415, 1803234, 1803235, 1868279 | ||
This comment is mass posted to all bugs blocking the Python 3.9 tracker, sorry if it is not 100 % relevant. When in doubt, please ask.
The Python 3.9 rebuild is in progress in a Koji side tag.
If you fix this bug, please don't rebuild the package in regular rawhide, but do it in the side tag with:
$ fedpkg build --target=f33-python
The rebuild is progressing slowly and it is possible this package won't have all the required build dependencies yet. If that's the case, please just leave the fix committed and pushed and we will eventually rebuild it for you.
You are not asked to go and try rebuild all the missing dependencies yourself. If you know there is a bootstrap loop in the dependencies, let me know and we can untangle it together.
If you want to test your fix or reproduce the failure, you can still use the Copr repo mentioned in the initial comment of this bug: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/
Python 3.9 update: The f33-python side tag is currently being merged.
New builds in f33-python are no longer possible, but python3 is not yet updated to Python 3.9 in rawhide. You can check when Python is Python 3.9 with:
$ koji wait-repo f33-build --build python3.9-3.9.0~b1-3.fc3
And build the packages normally after that.
*** Bug 1842163 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). Upstream is slowly working on this (https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/pull/3588) but there will be also changes in CPython related to ast issues (https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20312/files). Hello, This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. Apologies, assigning myself. Was in the midst of finishing my studies. Things have calmed down now. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 33 development cycle. Changing version to 33. Hello. This comment is mass posted to all 16 bugzillas for packages that failed to rebuild with Python 3.9 (and, in most cases, also fail to install on Fedora 33 and 34). Apologies if some of the suggestions or questions don't apply 100%. Fedora 33 Beta Freeze starts next week on Tuesday, 2020-08-25. I haven't spammed this bugzilla because it is in ASSIGNED, or I've seen upstream has been notified. Please consider what to do here. Is this failure critical? For example, can a test be temporarily skipped to make this package build? Is it possible to fix or workaround the failure before Fedora 33 Beta? Or before Fedora 33 Final? If not, would it make sense to retire the package (even temporarily) before the release to unblock updates from Fedora 31 or Fedora 32? In case you need any assistance with a Python-related problem with the build, don't hesitate to let me know and I'll try to have a look. Thank you! *** Bug 1871642 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** There is some work done by upstream to make the package functional with 3.9: https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/pull/3736/files However the PR to fully address the issues is still in draft state: https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/pull/3588 https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/pull/3736/files is included in the 0.9.21 release. Marking this dependent on the update bug. https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/pull/3588 is a draft but older than the above. I'll see the actual errors when updating to 0.9.21. Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 33-beta by Fedora user churchyard using the blocker tracking app because: The package does not install without the fix. FEDORA-2020-05da50e552 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-afca245174 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-afca245174 FEDORA-2020-afca245174 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-afca245174` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-afca245174 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Accepted as a Beta freeze exception: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/81 FEDORA-2020-afca245174 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2021-0bf2083471 has been pushed to the Fedora ELN stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |
xonsh fails to build with Python 3.9.0a5. ____________________ ERROR collecting tests/test_xonsh.xsh _____________________ ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/pytest_plugin.py:40: in collect mod = importlib.import_module(self.fspath.purebasename) /usr/lib64/python3.9/importlib/__init__.py:127: in import_module return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level) <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:1030: in _gcd_import ??? <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:1007: in _find_and_load ??? <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:986: in _find_and_load_unlocked ??? <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:680: in _load_unlocked ??? <frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>:786: in exec_module ??? ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:23413: in get_code code = execer.compile(src, glbs=ctx, locs=ctx) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:23101: in compile tree = self.parse(input, ctx, mode=mode, filename=filename, transform=transform) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:23061: in parse tree, input = self._parse_ctx_free(input, mode=mode, filename=filename) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:23182: in _parse_ctx_free tree = self.parser.parse( ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/parsers/base.py:543: in parse tree = self.parser.parse(input=s, lexer=self.lexer, debug=debug_level) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/ply/ply/yacc.py:335: in parse return self.parseopt_notrack(input, lexer, debug, tracking, tokenfunc) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/ply/ply/yacc.py:1122: in parseopt_notrack p.callable(pslice) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/parsers/base.py:2346: in p_atom_expr p[0] = self.apply_trailers(p[1], p[2]) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/parsers/base.py:2340: in apply_trailers assert False E assert False _________________ ERROR collecting tests/test_lib/test_os.xsh __________________ ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/pytest_plugin.py:40: in collect mod = importlib.import_module(self.fspath.purebasename) /usr/lib64/python3.9/importlib/__init__.py:127: in import_module return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level) <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:1030: in _gcd_import ??? <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:1007: in _find_and_load ??? <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:986: in _find_and_load_unlocked ??? <frozen importlib._bootstrap>:680: in _load_unlocked ??? <frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>:786: in exec_module ??? ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:23413: in get_code code = execer.compile(src, glbs=ctx, locs=ctx) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:23101: in compile tree = self.parse(input, ctx, mode=mode, filename=filename, transform=transform) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:23075: in parse tree = self.ctxtransformer.ctxvisit( ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:8313: in ctxvisit node = self.visit(node) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:395: in visit return visitor(node) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:471: in generic_visit value = self.visit(value) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:395: in visit return visitor(node) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:8528: in visit_FunctionDef self.generic_visit(node) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:471: in generic_visit value = self.visit(value) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:395: in visit return visitor(node) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:8506: in visit_With self.generic_visit(node) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:471: in generic_visit value = self.visit(value) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:395: in visit return visitor(node) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:8506: in visit_With self.generic_visit(node) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:471: in generic_visit value = self.visit(value) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:395: in visit return visitor(node) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:8428: in visit_Expr newnode = self.try_subproc_toks(node) ../../BUILDROOT/xonsh-0.9.13-2.fc33.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/xonsh/__amalgam__.py:8380: in try_subproc_toks increment_lineno(newnode, n=node.lineno - 1) /usr/lib64/python3.9/ast.py:230: in increment_lineno child.end_lineno = getattr(child, 'end_lineno', 0) + n E TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'int' !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 2 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.9/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01321133-xonsh/ For all our attempts to build xonsh with Python 3.9, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/package/xonsh/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.9: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.9 will be included in Fedora 33. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with early pre-releases of Python 3.9. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.