Bug 181994
Summary: | Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-19 17:31:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779, 482993 |
Description
Roozbeh Pournader
2006-02-18 15:58:58 UTC
There's essentially no difference between this package and charis-fonts (bug #181993), so here's a boring cut and paste. rpmlint says: W: doulos-fonts invalid-license SIL Open Font License W: doulos-fonts wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/doulos-fonts-4.0.14/DoulosSIL4FontDocumentation.pdf The license is acceptable; it's probably worth opening a bug against rpmlint to get it added. The second warning is just rpmlint being dumb; there's no point in paying attention to line endings in a PDF file. Anyway: rpmlint output is fine. The package meets the naming and packaging guidelines. The specfile is properly named and follows rather exactly that of a previously accepted package. The source file matches upstream. The license is appropriate and included as %doc. Approved. Thanks a lot for the review. Imported and built. |