Bug 1829076

Summary: dmarc configuration included though dmarc support not enabled in 4.93
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Marcel Haerry <mh>
Component: eximAssignee: Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel7CC: bennie.joubert, dwmw2, jskarvad, tremble
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: exim-4.93-2.el8 exim-4.93-2.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-05-15 05:14:32 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Marcel Haerry 2020-04-28 20:27:45 UTC
Sorry I was too quick reporting success in #1827425

You included dmarc config snippets, though you haven't enabled dmarc support.

E.g. here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exim/blob/epel7/f/exim-4.93-config.patch#_480

Thus: The default config currently fails if the particular acls are trying to be matched with:

 syntax error in "control=dmarc_disable_verify"


Although it would be nice to have it, there are probably missing deps for it.

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2020-04-29 10:03:48 UTC
(In reply to Marcel Haerry from comment #0)
> Sorry I was too quick reporting success in #1827425
> 
> You included dmarc config snippets, though you haven't enabled dmarc support.
> 
> E.g. here:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exim/blob/epel7/f/exim-4.93-config.
> patch#_480
> 
> Thus: The default config currently fails if the particular acls are trying
> to be matched with:
> 
>  syntax error in "control=dmarc_disable_verify"
> 
> 
> Although it would be nice to have it, there are probably missing deps for it.

No idea. It's enabled in the config (SUPPORT_DMARC=yes) and it's linked with the libopendmarc.so.2. I also verified, that the DMARC support code is compiled in.

Comment 2 Marcel Haerry 2020-04-29 11:41:45 UTC
Maybe that's the issue, exim doesn't require it:

$ rpm --requires -q exim | grep dmarc
$

I try to install the lib and see whether I can still reproduce the issue.

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2020-04-29 12:17:15 UTC
(In reply to Marcel Haerry from comment #2)
> Maybe that's the issue, exim doesn't require it:
> 
> $ rpm --requires -q exim | grep dmarc
> $
> 
> I try to install the lib and see whether I can still reproduce the issue.

Sorry, got it, it's EPEL-7, not Fedora. I didn't enable it during the build.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2020-04-29 17:52:26 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-04-29 17:53:04 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-04-30 06:08:08 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-04-30 06:09:22 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-05-15 05:14:32 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2020-05-15 06:04:06 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.