Bug 1829076 - dmarc configuration included though dmarc support not enabled in 4.93
Summary: dmarc configuration included though dmarc support not enabled in 4.93
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: exim
Version: epel7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-04-28 20:27 UTC by Marcel Haerry
Modified: 2020-05-15 06:04 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: exim-4.93-2.el8 exim-4.93-2.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-05-15 05:14:32 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Marcel Haerry 2020-04-28 20:27:45 UTC
Sorry I was too quick reporting success in #1827425

You included dmarc config snippets, though you haven't enabled dmarc support.

E.g. here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exim/blob/epel7/f/exim-4.93-config.patch#_480

Thus: The default config currently fails if the particular acls are trying to be matched with:

 syntax error in "control=dmarc_disable_verify"


Although it would be nice to have it, there are probably missing deps for it.

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2020-04-29 10:03:48 UTC
(In reply to Marcel Haerry from comment #0)
> Sorry I was too quick reporting success in #1827425
> 
> You included dmarc config snippets, though you haven't enabled dmarc support.
> 
> E.g. here:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exim/blob/epel7/f/exim-4.93-config.
> patch#_480
> 
> Thus: The default config currently fails if the particular acls are trying
> to be matched with:
> 
>  syntax error in "control=dmarc_disable_verify"
> 
> 
> Although it would be nice to have it, there are probably missing deps for it.

No idea. It's enabled in the config (SUPPORT_DMARC=yes) and it's linked with the libopendmarc.so.2. I also verified, that the DMARC support code is compiled in.

Comment 2 Marcel Haerry 2020-04-29 11:41:45 UTC
Maybe that's the issue, exim doesn't require it:

$ rpm --requires -q exim | grep dmarc
$

I try to install the lib and see whether I can still reproduce the issue.

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2020-04-29 12:17:15 UTC
(In reply to Marcel Haerry from comment #2)
> Maybe that's the issue, exim doesn't require it:
> 
> $ rpm --requires -q exim | grep dmarc
> $
> 
> I try to install the lib and see whether I can still reproduce the issue.

Sorry, got it, it's EPEL-7, not Fedora. I didn't enable it during the build.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2020-04-29 17:52:26 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-04-29 17:53:04 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-04-30 06:08:08 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-04-30 06:09:22 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-05-15 05:14:32 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a258dba917 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2020-05-15 06:04:06 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4410b3265a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.