Bug 1830797
Summary: | frr uses /usr/lib/frr/ rather using /usr/libexec/frr/ or /usr/(s)bin/ | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
Component: | frr | Assignee: | Michal Ruprich <mruprich> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mruprich |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-06-18 07:38:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Robert Scheck
2020-05-03 22:37:20 UTC
Hi Robert, I was sort-of following the upstream's idea about this location. When frr was still quagga, my previous maintainer packaged it so that each daemon would have its own unit file and could be started via systemd. Since then, frr developers reverted all of this and created a new initscript that would start up all of the daemons at once. I tried to argue with them that this was not a good idea but it led nowhere. Since all of the frr's processes are started via frrinit.sh, I don't see a problem with it being located in /usr/lib/frr together with all the other scripts and binaries. As for the libexec vs. lib directories, I don't really see much of an effective difference here. Regards, Michal I am closing this as WONTFIX. If you feel that this should be addressed, feel free to re-open this bug and we can discuss this. |