Bug 1831002

Summary: pod rings overlap on pod text
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Jeff Phillips <jephilli>
Component: Dev ConsoleAssignee: Jeff Phillips <jephilli>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Gajanan More <gamore>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.5CC: aos-bugs, nmukherj
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.5.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Version: 4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-05-01-231319 Cluster ID: 0c8301f0-2951-4f9c-9947-8d6f878e3d25 Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/81.0.4044.129 Safari/537.36
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 17:34:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
overlapping pod text
none
pod scaling none

Description Jeff Phillips 2020-05-04 13:25:34 UTC 
Created attachment 1684819 [details]
overlapping pod text

Created attachment 1684819 [details]
overlapping pod text

Description of problem:

The pod text is a workload in topology gets overlapped by the pod rings.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a deployment config using any of the add flows
2. scale up to multiple pods (say 8)

or
1. create a StatefulSets

Actual results:

The pod text overlaps the pod ring(s).

Expected results:

The pod text does not overlap the pod ring(s).

Additional info:
Comment 3 Gajanan More 2020-05-15 07:36:21 UTC 
I have validated the bugzilla on:
Build: 4.5.0-0.ci-2020-05-14-224329
Browser: Google Chrome Version 81.0.4044.129
Marking this as verified.
Comment 4 Gajanan More 2020-05-15 07:37:13 UTC 
Created attachment 1688804 [details]
pod scaling
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-13 17:34:39 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409