Bug 1831942

Summary: add pandoc-citeproc to RHEL 8 CRB
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component: distributionAssignee: RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.6CC: dank, fedora, jwboyer, orion, petersen
Target Milestone: betaKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-03-07 07:27:18 UTC Type: Enhancement
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1830821    

Description Robert Scheck 2020-05-06 00:54:14 UTC
Description of problem:
Please build pandoc-citeproc for EPEL 8. It's a build-time dependency of python-pypandoc.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pandoc-citeproc-0.16.2-1.fc32

Actual results:
No pandoc-citeproc in EPEL 8.

Expected results:
pandoc-citeproc-0.16.2-1.el8 - or better ;-)

Additional info:
Please let me know if you are not interested in maintaining the package on EPEL 8 branch.

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2020-09-07 10:01:40 UTC
There have been a lot of delays with getting ghc into EPEL8, but the initial work is finally done.
So hopefully there will be more progress soon.

Comment 2 Nick Black 2022-03-21 10:50:33 UTC
does ghc 8.2.2 suffice? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c24419cb8d

Comment 3 Orion Poplawski 2022-06-01 19:03:25 UTC
Any progress?  Any help needed?  Thanks.

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2022-06-22 05:37:32 UTC
In theory it might be quicker/easier to add pandoc-citeproc to RHEL8 CRB...

Bootstrapping pandoc in EPEL8 will still take some time I think.
Currently I am starting work on EPEL9 packages.
Though it seems EPEL8 might be more urgently needed.

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2022-06-22 05:38:30 UTC
I can just add that is it not a small amount of work:
pandoc has roughly 100 dependencies that need to be built..

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2022-06-22 05:39:28 UTC
Also I would be happy to setup a copr repo in the meantime if that is helpful.

Comment 9 Orion Poplawski 2023-01-17 05:01:30 UTC
I think we can drop this since new pypandoc's do not require pandoc-citeproc.

Comment 10 Jens Petersen 2023-01-17 07:18:46 UTC
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #9)
> I think we can drop this since new pypandoc's do not require pandoc-citeproc.

Does that require a newer version of pandoc?

Comment 12 RHEL Program Management 2023-03-07 07:27:18 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.