Bug 1831995

Summary: [DDF] I'm not sure which services are colocated in this example inventory. Are the mons and mgrs are colocated here? So
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Ranjini M N <rmandyam>
Documentation sub component: Install Guide QA Contact: Vasishta <vashastr>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: unspecified CC: amsyedha, assingh, flucifre, gmeno, gsitlani, hyelloji, kdreyer, khartsoe, maydin, pcuzner, rmandyam, tchandra, vashastr, vereddy
Version: 4.0Flags: jbrier: needinfo-
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.3   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-05 18:50:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1859104, 1966534    
Attachments:
Description Flags
updated colocation graphic with iSCSI instead of Grafana
none
updated non-colocation graphic with iSCSI instead of Grafana none

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2020-05-06 04:31:17 UTC 
I'm not sure which services are colocated in this example inventory. Are the mons and mgrs are colocated here? So osds and rgws run on seperate hosts?

Reported by: jkastning

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/4/html/installation_guide/colocation-of-containerized-ceph-daemons#annotations:ed17eb3b-233e-4dae-ba00-15262f815f86
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2020-05-06 04:31:23 UTC 
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Comment 2 John Brier 2020-06-19 19:33:00 UTC 
The example inventory file that 'jkastning' highlighted is confusing within this context. It doesn't show colocation at all AFAICT:

[mons]
MONITOR_NODE_NAME_1
MONITOR_NODE_NAME_2
MONITOR_NODE_NAME_3

[mgrs]
MONITOR_NODE_NAME_1
MONITOR_NODE_NAME_2
MONITOR_NODE_NAME_3

[osds]
OSD_NODE_NAME_1
OSD_NODE_NAME_2
OSD_NODE_NAME_3

[rgws]
RGW_NODE_NAME_1
RGW_NODE_NAME_2

It should be:

node1,node2,node3...node8

And you should have those nodes spread across the different roles so there is some colocation going on.
Comment 4 Karen Norteman 2020-06-30 16:08:29 UTC 
*** Bug 1801427 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 34 John Brier 2021-03-10 21:14:26 UTC 
Created attachment 1762457 [details]
updated colocation graphic with iSCSI instead of Grafana
Comment 35 John Brier 2021-03-10 21:15:15 UTC 
Created attachment 1762458 [details]
updated non-colocation graphic with iSCSI instead of Grafana