Bug 1832444
| Summary: | FTI: ghc-cabal-helper: ghc-cabal-helper, ghc-cabal-helper-devel, ghc-cabal-helper-prof, ghc-cabal-plan, ghc-cabal-plan-devel, ghc-cabal-plan-prof | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Igor Raits <igor.raits> |
| Component: | ghc-cabal-helper | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | petersen, quantum.analyst |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-07-21 10:12:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1803235 | ||
|
Description
Igor Raits
2020-05-06 17:20:34 UTC
As proposed during the F31 and F32 development cycles, we could fix this by retiring the package: nothing in Fedora really needs cabal-helper, though cabal-plan might have some uses as a tool. Otherwise we need to add optics-core and its dependency indexed-profunctors at least to get cabal-helper building. I would personally be more inclined to unsubpackage cabal-plan though... it is needed by cabal-flatpak for example. Checking more carefully in git, there are 3 more missing deps: semialign these topograph Also ghc-singleton-bool is currently subpackaged in ghc-servant. (Also note ghc-cabal-helper and ghc-cabal-plan are already obsoleted in ghc-obsoletes.) Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). I'm not super committed to keeping this around. However, if you need cabal-plan, then I don't want to just retire it. If you can package that, then I can orphan this and let it go via normal removals. Hello, This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. This package has been orphaned. You can pick it up at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-cabal-helper by clicking button "Take". If nobody picks it up, it will be retired and removed from a distribution. This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain). All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 33. Thanks for taking care of it! |