Bug 1835084
| Summary: | F33FailsToInstall: python3-pyghmi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Igor Raits <igor.raits> |
| Component: | python-pyghmi | Assignee: | Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dtantsur, jomara, lmartins, ykarel |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-05-29 14:39:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1768334 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1803235 | ||
|
Description
Igor Raits
2020-05-13 05:18:09 UTC
Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). Hi Igor! Both dateutil and six are quite foundational packages in the python world. Have they been removed or is it just a temporary glitch? The dateutil in Fedora is still 2.8.0, not 2.8.1. The six one I'm not sure. 2.8.1 was released half a year ago, it's strange we don't have it. I suspect we may be fine with 2.8.0, but I cannot be 100% sure. Six should be in rawhide: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-six, so I consider it a temporary condition. The problems have already been fixed in 1.5.14-2 in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyghmi/c/425fc8ec9cb5a5a70472e34b3e3ad2cc88d66686?branch=master (In reply to Dmitry Tantsur from comment #6) > The problems have already been fixed in 1.5.14-2 in > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyghmi/c/ > 425fc8ec9cb5a5a70472e34b3e3ad2cc88d66686?branch=master @dtabtsyr Actually that patch will not work in fedora as auto dependency generator is used and deps defined in requirements.txt are picked where minimal is set to 2.8.1, so either dateutil in rawhide needs to be build to 2.8.1 or sed -i 's/python-dateutil.*/python-dateutil>=2.6.1/' requirements.txt in %prep, for CentOS8 in RDO we did it like https://github.com/rdo-common/python-pyghmi/commit/c9495f4 with dependency generator Eeehhm, why do we mix manual and automatic dependencies? Oo Anyway, I've applied your suggestion and pushed 1.5.14-4. I'm not sure if I should build it right now given the 3.9 rebuild. Igor, could you advise? (In reply to Dmitry Tantsur from comment #8) > Eeehhm, why do we mix manual and automatic dependencies? Oo Feel free to remove manual ones :) > Anyway, I've applied your suggestion and pushed 1.5.14-4. I'm not sure if I > should build it right now given the 3.9 rebuild. Igor, could you advise? Build it in f33-python (fedpkg build --target f33-python). Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain). All subpackages of a package agaisnt which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 33. Thanks for taking care of it! |