Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain). Your package (python-pyghmi) Fails To Install in Fedora 33: can't install python3-pyghmi: - nothing provides pyhton3-dateutil >= 2.8.1 needed by python3-pyghmi-1.5.14-1.fc33.noarch - nothing provides pyhton3-six >= 1.10.0 needed by python3-pyghmi-1.5.14-1.fc33.noarch - nothing provides python3.8dist(python-dateutil) >= 2.8.1 needed by python3-pyghmi-1.5.14-1.fc33.noarch If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/ Thanks!
Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).
Hi Igor! Both dateutil and six are quite foundational packages in the python world. Have they been removed or is it just a temporary glitch?
The dateutil in Fedora is still 2.8.0, not 2.8.1. The six one I'm not sure.
2.8.1 was released half a year ago, it's strange we don't have it. I suspect we may be fine with 2.8.0, but I cannot be 100% sure. Six should be in rawhide: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-six, so I consider it a temporary condition.
The problems have already been fixed in 1.5.14-2 in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyghmi/c/425fc8ec9cb5a5a70472e34b3e3ad2cc88d66686?branch=master
(In reply to Dmitry Tantsur from comment #6) > The problems have already been fixed in 1.5.14-2 in > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyghmi/c/ > 425fc8ec9cb5a5a70472e34b3e3ad2cc88d66686?branch=master @dtabtsyr Actually that patch will not work in fedora as auto dependency generator is used and deps defined in requirements.txt are picked where minimal is set to 2.8.1, so either dateutil in rawhide needs to be build to 2.8.1 or sed -i 's/python-dateutil.*/python-dateutil>=2.6.1/' requirements.txt in %prep, for CentOS8 in RDO we did it like https://github.com/rdo-common/python-pyghmi/commit/c9495f4 with dependency generator
Eeehhm, why do we mix manual and automatic dependencies? Oo Anyway, I've applied your suggestion and pushed 1.5.14-4. I'm not sure if I should build it right now given the 3.9 rebuild. Igor, could you advise?
(In reply to Dmitry Tantsur from comment #8) > Eeehhm, why do we mix manual and automatic dependencies? Oo Feel free to remove manual ones :) > Anyway, I've applied your suggestion and pushed 1.5.14-4. I'm not sure if I > should build it right now given the 3.9 rebuild. Igor, could you advise? Build it in f33-python (fedpkg build --target f33-python).
done https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45009096
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain). All subpackages of a package agaisnt which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 33. Thanks for taking care of it!