Bug 183629

Summary: dos2unix erroneously strips \r
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 Reporter: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Component: dos2unixAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2.1CC: riel
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-145 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-13 20:52:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 57508    
Bug Blocks: 143573    

Description Tim Waugh 2006-03-02 12:32:19 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #57508 +++

Description of Problem:

If you give dos2unix a mac file (one where lines are separate by \r alone)
and accidentally ask it to convert in DOS mode, you get a file with no
newlines.

To me this seems like confusing behavior.  I'd prefer it if DOS conversion
mode changed `\r\n' to `\n' -- and left lone `\r's unmodified.  That
would reduce the potential for error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

dos2unix 3.1 (Thu Nov 19 1998)

How Reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


Additional Information:

-- Additional comment from bugs.michael on 2004-09-26 05:16 EST --
Created an attachment (id=104332)
a patch


-- Additional comment from bugs.michael on 2004-09-26 05:47 EST --
Created an attachment (id=104333)
patch (with uneeded lines dropped)

My post to fedora-patch-list bounced, and when I looked at the message, I've
noticed lines in the patch which I should have deleted earlier.


-- Additional comment from riel on 2004-09-26 10:05 EST --
The patch makes sense.  I haven't been able to test it because I have
no mac files here, but the code looks sane.

Mike, want to rebuild the package or should I rebuild it ?

-- Additional comment from bugs.michael on 2004-09-26 14:37 EST --
cat unixfile | tr \\n \\r > macfile


-- Additional comment from bugs.michael on 2004-09-26 15:03 EST --
Created an attachment (id=104335)
final patch

While the unneeded lines in the first patch did no harm (a cut'n'rename
mistake), the second patch lost the line delimiter of the last line when
running mac2unix on a Mac file. A minor detail, easily overlooked when running
tests.

$ cd /tmp
$ cat /etc/services | tr \\n \\r > macfile
$ ls -la macfile
-rw-------  1 misc2 misc2 19936 Sep 26 21:05 macfile
$ dos2unix -c Mac macfile
dos2unix: converting file macfile to UNIX format ...
$ ls -la macfile
-rw-------  1 misc2 misc2 19936 Sep 26 21:06 macfile
$ cat macfile | tr \\r \\n > unixfile
$ md5sum unixfile /etc/services
485eacadb2a1d18fcf66483f81829f02  unixfile
485eacadb2a1d18fcf66483f81829f02  /etc/services

[size and checksum stay the same]


-- Additional comment from riel on 2004-09-26 17:19 EST --
Patch applied in dos2unix-3.1-19

-- Additional comment from timp on 2005-05-19 20:35 EST --

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-195.html

Comment 4 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-03-13 20:52:35 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-145.html