Bug 183653
| Summary: | bcm43xx works fine with iwconfig but not with NM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Andrew Overholt <overholt> | ||||
| Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Christopher Aillon <caillon> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dwmw2, samuel.audet | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | powerpc | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2006-03-08 18:37:14 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 150223 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Andrew Overholt
2006-03-02 15:15:21 UTC
Created attachment 125538 [details]
/var/log/messages
Adding as blocker for FC5. Feel free to remove if this isn't important enough for a blocker. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 180369 *** Please try this again with the 2.6.16-1.2070 or later kernel, which has a bunch of fixes to make bcm43xx less picky about the order in which various initialisation functions are performed. Are those fixes that were included in verision 2.6.16-1.2070 this still valid for kernels version 2.6.17? It seems to screw up pretty dramatically with version 2.6.17-1.2145 and 2157 here ... I'm just wondering if those patches got removed or otherwise went unchecked ? (In reply to comment #5) > Are those fixes that were included in verision 2.6.16-1.2070 this still valid > for kernels version 2.6.17? It seems to screw up pretty dramatically with > version 2.6.17-1.2145 and 2157 here ... I'm just wondering if those patches got > removed or otherwise went unchecked ? I actually have pretty good luck at home and work but had a terrible time at OLS last week. I assumed it was very touchy about APs but maybe it's something else. Ubuntu seems to have patched wpa_supplicant and NetworkManager to fix this... https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/42504 But I'm not sure what was part of this "update" that fixed their issues... |