Bug 1839040

Summary: [DDF] Shouldn't we call it Multi-Cloud Object Gateway?
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage Reporter: Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component: documentationAssignee: Olive Lakra <olakra>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Raz Tamir <ratamir>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.3CC: bkunal, etamir, ocs-bugs, olakra
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-20 15:22:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1849769    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2020-05-22 11:30:04 UTC 
Shouldn't we call it Multi-Cloud Object Gateway?

Reported by: rhn-support-bkunal

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/4.3/html/deploying_openshift_container_storage/verifying-your-openshift-container-storage-installation_rhocs#annotations:e813241a-a810-4db9-8a60-ba9de9a98c86
Comment 2 Olive Lakra 2020-06-23 07:27:28 UTC 
Hi Eran,

When do we use 'MCG' and 'noobaa' in the docs? both terms are used interchangabily across the docs. Please clairfy?
Comment 3 Eran Tamir 2020-06-23 19:28:24 UTC 
The CLI, container images and CRDs are noobaa since changing them between upstream and downstream requires a lot of effort on the engineering side (and QE)
The documentation should refer to Multicloud Object Gateway along with the entire documentation, except when we show actual command or refer to CRDs. 
I'm aware that it's not clear, but I don't have an immediate better solution.