Bug 1839040 - [DDF] Shouldn't we call it Multi-Cloud Object Gateway?
Summary: [DDF] Shouldn't we call it Multi-Cloud Object Gateway?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: documentation
Version: 4.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Olive Lakra
QA Contact: Raz Tamir
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1849769
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-05-22 11:30 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2020-09-20 15:22 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-20 15:22:13 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2020-05-22 11:30:04 UTC 
Shouldn't we call it Multi-Cloud Object Gateway?

Reported by: rhn-support-bkunal

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/4.3/html/deploying_openshift_container_storage/verifying-your-openshift-container-storage-installation_rhocs#annotations:e813241a-a810-4db9-8a60-ba9de9a98c86
Comment 2 Olive Lakra 2020-06-23 07:27:28 UTC 
Hi Eran,

When do we use 'MCG' and 'noobaa' in the docs? both terms are used interchangabily across the docs. Please clairfy?
Comment 3 Eran Tamir 2020-06-23 19:28:24 UTC 
The CLI, container images and CRDs are noobaa since changing them between upstream and downstream requires a lot of effort on the engineering side (and QE)
The documentation should refer to Multicloud Object Gateway along with the entire documentation, except when we show actual command or refer to CRDs. 
I'm aware that it's not clear, but I don't have an immediate better solution.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.