Bug 1841119
| Summary: | Get rid of config patches and pass flags directly to kcm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Maciej Szulik <maszulik> |
| Component: | kube-controller-manager | Assignee: | Maciej Szulik <maszulik> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | zhou ying <yinzhou> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 4.6 | CC: | aos-bugs, mfojtik |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | UpcomingSprint |
| Target Release: | 4.7.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-02-24 15:12:15 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Maciej Szulik
2020-05-28 12:27:00 UTC
I’m adding UpcomingSprint, because I was occupied by fixing bugs with higher priority/severity, developing new features with higher priority, or developing new features to improve stability at a macro level. I will revisit this bug next sprint. I’m adding UpcomingSprint, because I was occupied by fixing bugs with higher priority/severity, developing new features with higher priority, or developing new features to improve stability at a macro level. I will revisit this bug next sprint. I’m adding UpcomingSprint, because I was occupied by fixing bugs with higher priority/severity, developing new features with higher priority, or developing new features to improve stability at a macro level. I will revisit this bug next sprint. This bug hasn't had any activity in the last 30 days. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're marking this bug as "LifecycleStale" and decreasing the severity/priority. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please update it, otherwise this bug can be closed in about 7 days. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. Additionally, you can add LifecycleFrozen into Keywords if you think this bug should never be marked as stale. Please consult with bug assignee before you do that. It's still being worked on. This requires a significant amount of work, and we won't be able to address that in 4.6, moving to 4.7 I’m adding UpcomingSprint, because I was occupied by fixing bugs with higher priority/severity, developing new features with higher priority, or developing new features to improve stability at a macro level. I will revisit this bug next sprint. This bug hasn't had any activity in the last 30 days. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're marking this bug as "LifecycleStale" and decreasing the severity/priority. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please update it, otherwise this bug can be closed in about 7 days. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. Additionally, you can add LifecycleFrozen into Keywords if you think this bug should never be marked as stale. Please consult with bug assignee before you do that. This is actively being worked one, like just now :-) This is waiting in the queue for green CI and reviews. PR in the queue. I've marked this as blocker b/c having this included will allow us to simplify k8s upgrades. We're moving the configuration of kube-controller-manager from openshift/kubernetes to the operator. The operator bits already merged https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/471 and https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/415 changes are waiting for k8s bump to land and will merge right afterwards. PR in the queue. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.7.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5633 |