Bug 1842198
| Summary: | [RFE] client reconnection on blocklist/eviction | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell> |
| Component: | CephFS | Assignee: | Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Yogesh Mane <ymane> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Ranjini M N <rmandyam> |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | ceph-eng-bugs, hyelloji, kdreyer, rmandyam, sweil, vereddy |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, TestOnly |
| Target Release: | 5.0 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-16.0.0-8633.el8cp | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: |
.`mount.ceph` has an additional option of `recover_session=clean`
With this release, an additional option of `recover_session=clean` is added to `mount.ceph`.
With this option, the client reconnects to the {storage-product} cluster automatically when it detects that it is blocklisted by Metadata servers (MDS) and the mounts are recovered automatically.
See the link:{cephfs-guide}#emoving-a-ceph-file-system-client-from-the-blocklist_fs[_Removing a Ceph File System client from the blocklist_] section in the _{storage-product} File System Guide_ for more information.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-08-30 08:25:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1959686 | ||
|
Description
Patrick Donnelly
2020-05-30 23:33:47 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 bug fix and enhancement), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3294 |