Bug 1843275

Summary:	Request to move twolame-devel from buildroot to CRB
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	twolame	Assignee:	Wim Taymans <wtaymans>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Tomas Pelka <tpelka>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	8.3	CC:	csoriano, jkoten, jwboyer, sujagtap, tpelka, wtaymans
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	8.4
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	twolame-0.3.13-12.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-05-18 15:59:23 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert Scheck 2020-06-02 23:57:03 UTC

Description of problem:
As of writing, RHEL 8 does not ship a twolame-devel package, which prevents from building some software components requiring twolame-devel, such as baresip-mpa.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
twolame-libs-0.3.13-11.el8

How reproducible:
Always, see above and below.

Actual results:
No twolame-devel package.

Expected results:
Existence of a twolame-devel package.

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2020-06-22 20:07:22 UTC

May I kindly ask for a public status update? Will this definitely be resolved for RHEL 8.3? Or do you need a formal business justification and/or escalation request via GSS? If so, please let me know.

Comment 3 Wim Taymans 2020-06-23 10:19:23 UTC

(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #2)
> May I kindly ask for a public status update? Will this definitely be
> resolved for RHEL 8.3? Or do you need a formal business justification and/or
> escalation request via GSS? If so, please let me know.

You will need a business justification and request an exception to get this
in rhel 8.3 at this point.

Comment 7 Robert Scheck 2021-01-11 11:50:22 UTC

Cross-filed case 02840771 for missing -devel package at the Red Hat customer portal. And could somebody please remove the view restriction of this bug report for only Red Hat groups?

Comment 17 Robert Scheck 2021-03-26 14:10:13 UTC

Josh, do you see any chance to get this moved forward (similar like bug #1895872) or at least a rough ETA? GSS/CEE just asks repeatedly for more patience...

Comment 18 Josh Boyer 2021-03-26 14:28:42 UTC

(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #17)
> Josh, do you see any chance to get this moved forward (similar like bug
> #1895872) or at least a rough ETA? GSS/CEE just asks repeatedly for more
> patience...

The package is available in CentOS Stream today:

http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/twolame-devel-0.3.13-12.el8.x86_64.rpm

It will be released with RHEL in the next minor release which should be late April/early May.

Comment 19 Robert Scheck 2021-03-26 22:14:28 UTC

(In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #18)
> The package is available in CentOS Stream today:
> 
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/
> twolame-devel-0.3.13-12.el8.x86_64.rpm
> 
> It will be released with RHEL in the next minor release which should be late
> April/early May.

EPEL doesn't seem to use CentOS 8 Stream, but RHEL 8...at least EPEL 8 builds are still failing. But fortunately the next minor release doesn't seem to be that far away.

Comment 21 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 15:59:23 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (pulseaudio bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1903