Bug 184553

Summary: Kudzu does not find modem on com1 port.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Arno Versfeld <aversfeld>
Component: kudzuAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4CC: aversfeld, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i586   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-09 20:10:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Arno Versfeld 2006-03-09 20:05:18 UTC
Description of problem:
Fedora Core 2.6.11-1, 1369_FC4
At installation time the Dubury V90 modem, model K56E - external modem, is not 
picked up. 
No entry /dev/modem is created.
At boot time the said modem is not picked up.
When I run Kudzu at a prompt it does not pick up the modem. 
There is no reference to a modem in /etc/sysconfig/hwconf.
Windows XP Pro has no problem with the modem on com1.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
I don't know what the version of Kudzu is.

How reproducible:

Consistantly fails to find the modem.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Boot machine - modem not reported as new hardware
2.Run Kudzu at the prompt - modem not reported as new hardware
3.
  
Actual results:

When running Kudzu it simply does not report anything.

Expected results:

New hardware found.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2006-03-09 20:10:46 UTC
The serial probe is disabled by default:

* Fri Dec 17 2004 Bill Nottingham <notting> - 1.1.104-1
...
- don't probe serial bus by default in /usr/sbin/kudzu

as it causes issues with serial attached devices if they are currently in use
(serial consoles, etc.).

As kudzu is deprecated for hardware enumeration in FC 5 and later (apps should
use the HAL library) it is unlikely that this will be changed.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2006-03-09 20:20:48 UTC
*** Bug 184554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***