Bug 1847969
| Summary: | IPv6 bare metal deployment with calico has kube-proxy binding on 0.0.0.0 instead of the IPv6 address | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Ben Bennett <bbennett> |
| Component: | Networking | Assignee: | Ben Bennett <bbennett> |
| Networking sub component: | openshift-sdn | QA Contact: | Boris Deschenes <bdeschen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | ||
| Priority: | high | CC: | anbhat, aojeagar, bbennett, bdeschen, dcbw, dosmith, jtanenba, mcornea, zzhao |
| Version: | 4.4 | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.5.z | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 1831006 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2020-10-12 15:47:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1831006 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1833048 | ||
|
Comment 2
Antonio Ojea
2020-06-17 13:40:49 UTC
Hi, Boris could you help verified this bug with calico on 4.5 version with ipv6 cluster? this has been fixed and a single-stack IPv6 deployment now sees its kube-proxy binds to :: instead of 0.0.0.0 during calico deployment.. thank you this has been fixed and a single-stack IPv6 deployment now sees its kube-proxy binds to :: instead of 0.0.0.0 during calico deployment.. thank you this bug was mistakenly closed instead of set to verified Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.5.14 bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3843 |