Bug 1850664
| Summary: | RFE - Add an option for the Retro Changelog to ignore some attributes. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Têko Mihinto <tmihinto> |
| Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | Jamie Chapman <jachapma> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | RHDS QE <ds-qe-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfe> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.2 | CC: | gfialova, jachapma, mreynolds, pasik, sgouvern, spichugi, tbordaz, vashirov |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged |
| Target Release: | 8.0 | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 389-ds-1.4-8050020210514191740-d5c171fc | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: |
.Directory Server can exclude attributes and suffixes from the retro changelog database
This enhancement adds the `nsslapd-exclude-attrs` and `nsslapd-exclude-suffix` parameters to Directory Server. You can set these parameters in the `cn=Retro Changelog Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config` entry to exclude certain attributes or suffixes from the retro changelog database.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-11-09 18:10:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Têko Mihinto
2020-06-24 16:22:25 UTC
Need to be careful of impact to sync repl... Just to be clear on the requirement here: Would the customer like the capability to exclude some retro changelog attributes from a search using dsconf or is it something larger ? For example: sudo dsconf -D "cn=dm" inst01 plugin retro-changelog show --exclattr dontshowme --exclattr dontshowmeeither I reviewed the doc text and I have no suggestions for changes. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (389-ds-base bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4203 |