RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1850664 - RFE - Add an option for the Retro Changelog to ignore some attributes.
Summary: RFE - Add an option for the Retro Changelog to ignore some attributes.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 8.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: Jamie Chapman
QA Contact: RHDS QE
Marc Muehlfeld
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-06-24 16:22 UTC by Têko Mihinto
Modified: 2023-10-06 20:49 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-1.4-8050020210514191740-d5c171fc
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Directory Server can exclude attributes and suffixes from the retro changelog database This enhancement adds the `nsslapd-exclude-attrs` and `nsslapd-exclude-suffix` parameters to Directory Server. You can set these parameters in the `cn=Retro Changelog Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config` entry to exclude certain attributes or suffixes from the retro changelog database.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-09 18:10:45 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 4701 0 None open RFE: Add an option to exclude sensitive attributes from the retro changelog DB 2021-04-30 06:04:37 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2021:4203 0 None None None 2021-11-09 18:11:08 UTC

Description Têko Mihinto 2020-06-24 16:22:25 UTC
Description of problem:
A customer would like to have an option to exclude some attributes from the Retro Changelog DB.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHDS 10.
Since this is an RFE, filing it for RHDS 11.

How reproducible:
Always.


Steps to Reproduce:
Configure the Retro Changelog plugin.

Actual results:
There is no such option.

Expected results:
It might be nice for some customers.

Additional info:

Comment 4 mreynolds 2021-01-13 15:26:13 UTC
Need to be careful of impact to sync repl...

Comment 6 Jamie Chapman 2021-03-18 13:38:48 UTC
Just to be clear on the requirement here:

Would the customer like the capability to exclude some retro changelog attributes from a search using dsconf or is it something larger ?

For example: sudo dsconf -D "cn=dm" inst01 plugin retro-changelog show --exclattr dontshowme --exclattr dontshowmeeither

Comment 20 Gabi Fialová 2021-09-30 08:08:02 UTC
I reviewed the doc text and I have no suggestions for changes.

Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2021-11-09 18:10:45 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (389-ds-base bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4203


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.