Bug 185490

Summary: Unicode LRO defect
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jong Bae KO <jko>
Component: pangoAssignee: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: eng-i18n-bugs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-09-30 18:40:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
snippet
none
Bad shaping
none
Good shaping none

Description Jong Bae KO 2006-03-15 06:16:37 UTC 
Description of problem:
"When LRO is used PangoLayout shaping fails.
Compile and run the snippet, notice the shaping is wrong.

The unicode sequence is: 
\u202d\u0637\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0020\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0020\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f
Where \u202d == LRO" 
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150883

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Jong Bae KO 2006-03-15 07:03:45 UTC 
Created attachment 126144 [details]
snippet
Comment 2 Jong Bae KO 2006-03-15 07:05:08 UTC 
Created attachment 126145 [details]
Bad shaping
Comment 3 Jong Bae KO 2006-03-15 07:06:06 UTC 
Created attachment 126146 [details]
Good shaping
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2006-06-20 05:09:44 UTC 
Reassigning pango bugs to Behdad.
Comment 5 Akira TAGOH 2006-11-01 13:39:00 UTC 
Jong, does this still happen on fc6 say?
Comment 6 Jong Bae KO 2006-11-02 06:18:15 UTC 
Hi, Tagoh

I am trying to test it, but how can i test it?
I couldn't figure out yet, because I just reported it :(
.
Comment 7 Behdad Esfahbod 2006-11-02 23:46:44 UTC 
It still happens, yes.   This needs some time to fix it properly, but it's
rather low priority on my scale.
Comment 8 Liang Zhang 2007-09-28 03:25:04 UTC 
This bug in the upstream bugzilla is:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150883

And this bug in the upstream bugzilla has already been fixed.
So this bug can be closed.