Bug 1857220

Summary: [Serial][sig-node][Feature:TopologyManager] Configured cluster with non-gu workload should run with no regressions with single pod, single container requesting multiple cores [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] consistently failing in 4.6/master
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: OpenShift BugZilla Robot <openshift-bugzilla-robot>
Component: NodeAssignee: Francesco Romani <fromani>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Walid A. <wabouham>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.6CC: aos-bugs, ddharwar, fromani, fsimonce, jokerman, msivak, rphillips, wabouham, weinliu, yjoseph
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.5.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-22 12:20:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1851623    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 Walid A. 2020-07-15 17:17:08 UTC
I ran yesterday the Topology Manager E2E test suite on OCP 4.5.0rc.5 baremetal cluster (multi-numa workers with enabled sr-iov VFs, 40 cpu cores per numa node) from https://github.com/openshift/origin.git master branch:

13 pass, 0 skip (15m35s).  All tests passed including this test: 

started: (0/13/13) "[Serial][sig-node][Feature:TopologyManager] Configured cluster with non-gu workload should run with no regressions with single pod, single container requesting multiple cores [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

passed: (56s) 2020-07-14T21:26:59 "[Serial][sig-node][Feature:TopologyManager] Configured cluster with non-gu workload should run with no regressions with single pod, single container requesting multiple cores [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]"

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-22 12:20:42 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2956