Bug 1876003

Summary:	Please make fzf available in EPEL 8
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Xinyu Chen <systemwuxi>
Component:	fzf	Assignee:	Carl George 🎩 <carl>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel8	CC:	angel.rp, carl, ego.cordatus, go-sig, miminar, quantum.analyst, redhat.bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	fzf-0.58.0-2.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-02-20 03:03:46 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Xinyu Chen 2020-09-04 20:38:07 UTC

Description of problem:

fzf is a general-purpose command-line fuzzy finder. It is available in Fedora but not in CentOS 8. It would be useful to have it available in CentOS 8.

Fedora package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fzf

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
N/A

How reproducible:
N/A

Steps to Reproduce:
N/A

Actual results:
N/A

Expected results:
N/A

Additional info:
This is my first bug report. Please let me know if the category is not correct.

Comment 1 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2020-09-04 20:50:56 UTC

I have no interest in EPEL. If you want it there, you'll have to become the EPEL maintainer or find someone with such interest to do so.

Comment 2 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2021-02-06 01:16:42 UTC

Are you interested in this, @miminar?

Comment 3 Michal Minar 2021-02-06 02:41:41 UTC

Yes, I'll take care of it next week.

Comment 4 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2021-02-06 03:09:12 UTC

PS, now that we have branch-specific assignees, should I set you as EPEL contact?

Comment 5 Michal Minar 2021-02-09 17:05:53 UTC

Hi Elliott, yes, you can.

Comment 6 Michal Minar 2021-02-15 09:46:51 UTC

Update: waiting for approval of epel8 branch's creation: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32118

Comment 7 Michal Minar 2021-03-08 06:27:18 UTC

Hi Elliott, it looks like you need to make the request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32118

Comment 8 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2021-03-14 01:15:45 UTC

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32789

Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2022-12-13 00:07:31 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 10 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-12-21 12:12:38 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 11 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2023-12-21 21:31:07 UTC

*** Bug 2229488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Michel Lind 2024-02-22 02:48:40 UTC

Not sure what happened to the previous attempt to package this in EPEL 8. I'm personally not interested in EPEL 8 so marking this back and NEW and not assigned to anyone.

Comment 13 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2024-10-27 22:51:31 UTC

*** Bug 2283837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 14 Carl George 🎩 2025-01-04 10:26:09 UTC

I worked up some changes to the spec file that would have it working from epel8 all the way to rawhide.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fzf/pull-request/6

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2025-02-12 02:46:26 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7bcf0bdebb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7bcf0bdebb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2025-02-20 03:03:46 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7bcf0bdebb (fzf-0.58.0-2.el8) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.