Bug 1876003 - Please make fzf available in EPEL 8
Summary: Please make fzf available in EPEL 8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: fzf
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Carl George 🤠
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2229488 2283837 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-09-04 20:38 UTC by Xinyu Chen
Modified: 2025-02-20 03:03 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: fzf-0.58.0-2.el8
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-20 03:03:46 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Xinyu Chen 2020-09-04 20:38:07 UTC 
Description of problem:

fzf is a general-purpose command-line fuzzy finder. It is available in Fedora but not in CentOS 8. It would be useful to have it available in CentOS 8.

Fedora package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fzf

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
N/A

How reproducible:
N/A

Steps to Reproduce:
N/A

Actual results:
N/A

Expected results:
N/A

Additional info:
This is my first bug report. Please let me know if the category is not correct.
Comment 1 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2020-09-04 20:50:56 UTC 
I have no interest in EPEL. If you want it there, you'll have to become the EPEL maintainer or find someone with such interest to do so.
Comment 2 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2021-02-06 01:16:42 UTC 
Are you interested in this, @miminar?
Comment 3 Michal Minar 2021-02-06 02:41:41 UTC 
Yes, I'll take care of it next week.
Comment 4 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2021-02-06 03:09:12 UTC 
PS, now that we have branch-specific assignees, should I set you as EPEL contact?
Comment 5 Michal Minar 2021-02-09 17:05:53 UTC 
Hi Elliott, yes, you can.
Comment 6 Michal Minar 2021-02-15 09:46:51 UTC 
Update: waiting for approval of epel8 branch's creation: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32118
Comment 7 Michal Minar 2021-03-08 06:27:18 UTC 
Hi Elliott, it looks like you need to make the request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32118
Comment 8 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2021-03-14 01:15:45 UTC 
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32789
Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2022-12-13 00:07:31 UTC 
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
Comment 10 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-12-21 12:12:38 UTC 
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
Comment 11 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2023-12-21 21:31:07 UTC 
*** Bug 2229488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Michel Lind 2024-02-22 02:48:40 UTC 
Not sure what happened to the previous attempt to package this in EPEL 8. I'm personally not interested in EPEL 8 so marking this back and NEW and not assigned to anyone.
Comment 13 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2024-10-27 22:51:31 UTC 
*** Bug 2283837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Carl George 🤠 2025-01-04 10:26:09 UTC 
I worked up some changes to the spec file that would have it working from epel8 all the way to rawhide.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fzf/pull-request/6
Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2025-02-12 02:46:26 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7bcf0bdebb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7bcf0bdebb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2025-02-20 03:03:46 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7bcf0bdebb (fzf-0.58.0-2.el8) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.