Bug 188481

Summary: docbook2X fails to build because of missing perl-XML-SAX dependency
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Prarit Bhargava <prarit>
Component: docbook2XAssignee: Patrice Dumas <pertusus>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: extras-qa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 0.8.6-1.fc6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-04-10 17:49:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163350    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch to fix docbook2X spec file none

Description Prarit Bhargava 2006-04-10 15:12:17 UTC 
Description of problem: 
 
docbook2X RPM fails to build because of a missing Requires: perl-XML-SAX line. 
 
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 
 
docbook2X-0.8.5-2.fc5.src.rpm 
 
How reproducible: 100% 
 
 
Steps to Reproduce: 
1. rpmbuild --rebuild source rpm or rpmbuild -bb spec file 
 
   
Actual results: 
 
RPM fails to build. 
 
Expected results: 
 
RPM should build.
Comment 1 Prarit Bhargava 2006-04-10 15:12:18 UTC 
Created attachment 127550 [details]
Patch to fix docbook2X spec file
Comment 2 Patrice Dumas 2006-04-10 17:13:12 UTC 
Ok. From my investigation, it looks like it comes from the perl -c call. I'll
apply it soon, but since there is a new release, I'll update at the same time.
Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2006-04-10 17:14:19 UTC 
Shouldn't it be a BuildRequires instead of a Requires?
Comment 4 Prarit Bhargava 2006-04-10 17:15:32 UTC 
>Shouldn't it be a BuildRequires instead of a Requires? 
 
:) Yep, you're right.  My bad. 
 
P.
Comment 5 Patrice Dumas 2006-04-10 17:49:54 UTC 
Fixed in 0.8.6-1.fc6