Bug 188484
Summary: | gnome-sudoku fails to build because of rpm spec file errors | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Prarit Bhargava <prarit> | ||||
Component: | gnome-sudoku | Assignee: | Paul W. Frields <stickster> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5 | CC: | extras-qa | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-04-13 11:38:04 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 163350 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Prarit Bhargava
2006-04-10 15:34:04 UTC
Created attachment 127552 [details]
Patch to fix %if typos in gnome-sudoku rpm spec file
The patch is missing because you've picked up an FC5/rawhide version of the SRPM, which doesn't include the patch since it isn't needed there. The SRPM would be more portable if it included the patch file in the SRPM unconditionally and just used the %{fedora} macro to decide whether or not to apply the patch. >The patch is missing because you've picked up an FC5/rawhide version of the SRPM, which doesn't include the patch since it isn't needed there. Ok, but I'm building on a system with [root@altix2 SPECS]# rpm -q fedora-release fedora-release-5.89-rawhide Is there another RPM package I need to update such that %{fedora} resolves correctly? >The SRPM would be more portable if it included the patch file in the SRPM unconditionally and just used the %{fedora} macro to decide whether or not to apply the patch. IMO, that's probably a better way to do it ... P. |