Bug 1891532

Summary: openshift-object-counts quota is not dynamically updating as the resource is deleted.
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Lukasz Szaszkiewicz <lszaszki>
Component: kube-controller-managerAssignee: Lukasz Szaszkiewicz <lszaszki>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: zhou ying <yinzhou>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.4CC: aos-bugs, ggore, igreen, jokerman, knarra, lszaszki, maszulik, mfojtik, sthakare, sttts, yinzhou
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.4.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1891527 Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-01-13 18:14:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1891527    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 2 Lukasz Szaszkiewicz 2020-11-16 09:48:16 UTC
I'm in the process of backporting the fix to the earlier version.

Comment 7 zhou ying 2020-12-04 12:54:17 UTC
Confirmed with latest payload , the issue has fixed:
[root@dhcp-140-138 ~]# oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-12-04-062247   True        False         10m     Cluster version is 4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-12-04-062247

[root@dhcp-140-138 ~]# oc project zhouy
Now using project "zhouy" on server "https://api.yinzhou1204-4.qe.devcluster.openshift.com:6443".
[root@dhcp-140-138 ~]# oc create quota test1 --hard=openshift.io/imagestreams=10
resourcequota/test1 created

[root@localhost ~]# oc describe quota test1
Name:                      test1
Namespace:                 zhouy
Resource                   Used  Hard
--------                   ----  ----
openshift.io/imagestreams  0     10
[root@localhost ~]# oc new-app httpd-example

[root@localhost ~]# oc describe quota test1
Name:                      test1
Namespace:                 zhouy
Resource                   Used  Hard
--------                   ----  ----
openshift.io/imagestreams  1     10

[root@localhost ~]# oc get is 
NAME            IMAGE REPOSITORY                                                       TAGS     UPDATED
httpd-example   image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/zhouy/httpd-example   latest   38 seconds ago
ruby-ex         image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/zhouy/ruby-ex                  
[root@localhost ~]# oc describe quota test1
Name:                      test1
Namespace:                 zhouy
Resource                   Used  Hard
--------                   ----  ----
openshift.io/imagestreams  2     10
[root@localhost ~]# oc delete all --all
pod "httpd-example-1-build" deleted
pod "httpd-example-1-deploy" deleted
pod "httpd-example-1-jl7ln" deleted
pod "ruby-ex-1-build" deleted
replicationcontroller "httpd-example-1" deleted
service "httpd-example" deleted
service "ruby-ex" deleted
deploymentconfig.apps.openshift.io "httpd-example" deleted
deploymentconfig.apps.openshift.io "ruby-ex" deleted
buildconfig.build.openshift.io "httpd-example" deleted
buildconfig.build.openshift.io "ruby-ex" deleted
imagestream.image.openshift.io "httpd-example" deleted
imagestream.image.openshift.io "ruby-ex" deleted
route.route.openshift.io "httpd-example" deleted
[root@localhost ~]# oc get is 
No resources found in zhouy namespace.
[root@localhost ~]# oc describe quota test1
Name:                      test1
Namespace:                 zhouy
Resource                   Used  Hard
--------                   ----  ----
openshift.io/imagestreams  0     10

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2021-01-13 18:14:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.4.32 bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0029