Bug 1891603
Summary: | dnf system upgrade error: kernel-srpm-macros-1.0-3.fc33 not allowing redhat-rpm-config install | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mark Palmeri <mark.palmeri> |
Component: | kernel-srpm-macros | Assignee: | Troy Dawson <tdawson> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 33 | CC: | tdawson |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-11-10 17:22:33 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mark Palmeri
2020-10-26 19:41:53 UTC
Looking at the following line "package kernel-srpm-macros-1.0-3.fc33.noarch is filtered out by exclude filtering" I am guessing that you have something like exclude=kernel* in one, or many of your repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ and/or in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf Is this the case? You are 100% correct. dnf.conf had that option set (not sure how/who did that at some point in the system's history). Thanks for the insight... that has brought closure to a lot of frustration and now will let the dnf-based system upgrade to proceed on other systems that were affected. Good to hear. Are we ok closing this bug then? Absolutely; close away! |