Bug 190367
| Summary: | Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michael J Knox <michael> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dennis, gauret |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-07-24 12:35:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||
|
Description
Rex Dieter
2006-05-01 17:33:22 UTC
For devel/fc6 branch only, since it requires sip >= 4.4.3 Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyKDE-3.15.2-0.4.20060422.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyKDE-3.15.2-0.4.20060422.src.rpm %changelog * Fri May 12 2006 Rex Dieter 3.15.2-0.3.20060422 - drop sip-abi crud, rely (only) on Requires: PyQt Seeing how this has been sitting for a bit, I will do the review. Review for release 0.4.20060422: * Source PyKDE-snapshot20060422.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of PyKDE-devel looks OK * rpmlint of PyKDE looks OK * File list of PyKDE-devel looks OK * File list of PyKDE looks OK Needs work: * Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines (wiki: PackageNamingGuidelines) I am not certain, but the package naming guidelines talk about the use of cvs in the snapshot version. I noticed this is an upstream snapshot, so I am not sure if this applies. * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) There is a COPYING in the tarball, it should be added to the %docs This package is also GPL not MIT. Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: python-devel (by sip-devel), sip-devel (by PyQt-devel) > * Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines IMO, it does, since as you noted, this is an upstream snapshot. > * Duplicate BuildRequires: python-devel (by sip-devel), sip-devel (by > PyQt-devel) this package directly uses the items used in the BuildRequires, and it's not wise to rely upon implied dependancies of other pkgs. Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyKDE.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyKDE-3.15.2-0.5.20060422.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 21 2006 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]users.sf.net> 3.15.2-0.5.20060422 - %%doc AUTHORS COPYING - License: GPL OK, thats what I thought re "cvs". As for the BR. I kinda disagree, as we rely on implied depends everwhere else. However, its not a blocker, so consider it APPROVED. Please remember to close this review once imported into CVS. Thanks, importing... |