Bug 190673
Summary: | FC5 flex version looks quite old | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Benjamin Thery <oxben> |
Component: | flex | Assignee: | Petr Machata <pmachata> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | CC: | mnewsome |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-06-30 10:13:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Benjamin Thery
2006-05-04 12:57:51 UTC
New flex was one of things I wanted to push when I took over the maintenance of flex. But for the same reasons that are mentioned here [1] I didn't. I'll see if we can provide new flex as extras package, or something along these lines, so those more adventurous can see if it works. (The problem obviously is that flex is required for building, so mere installation doesn't show anything. You need to actually use it to build things, and vastly less people build with flex on fedora than just use it...) [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-May/msg00077.html |