Bug 190930
Summary: | seahorse nautilus plugin issue | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor> |
Component: | seahorse | Assignee: | Seth Vidal <skvidal> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | extras-qa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-14 04:41:55 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Piergiorgio Sartor
2006-05-06 20:54:52 UTC
yah - not much to be done on that here. would you be willing to open this bug upstream with seahorse? thanks (In reply to comment #1) > yah - not much to be done on that here. > > would you be willing to open this bug upstream with seahorse? Uhm, my understand was that, being an FC user, I have to "request" improvements here and then the maintainer, which is supposed to know better, will take the proper actions (report upstream, create a patch, and so on). So, to answer to your question, no :-) I do not want to feed the request upstream, in this case (unless really really necessary). Since I consider this an improvement for Fedora, I guess you should evaluate if it makes sense and decide what to do. Keep in mind that gpa does already everything, it only lacks the nautilus integration, so either seahorse offers a valid alternative, or it should be dropped completely. Anyway, thanks for your understanding. |